AI Compliance Requirements by State
27 states have enacted AI or data privacy laws that require specific documentation from businesses using AI. Here's how they compare.
State AI Law Comparison
Sorted by effective date, earliest first. Only state-level laws with active documentation requirements shown.
| State | Law | Effective | Status | Max Penalty | Package | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia | Virginia CDPA | January 1, 2023 | In Effect | Up to $7,500 per violation (§ 59.1-584(C)) | $249 | View Package |
| Virginia | VA Consumer Rights Kit | January 1, 2023 | In Effect | Up to $7,500 per violation (§ 59.1-584(C)) | $99 | View Package |
| Virginia | VA Profiling Assessment Workbook | January 1, 2023 | In Effect | Up to $7,500 per violation (§ 59.1-584(C)) | $109 | View Package |
| Virginia | VA Controller-Processor Kit | January 1, 2023 | In Effect | Up to $7,500 per violation (§ 59.1-584(C)) | $89 | View Package |
| Connecticut | Connecticut CTDPA | July 1, 2023 | In Effect | Up to $5,000 per violation (CUTPA, § 42-110o) | $249 | View Package |
| New York City | NYC Local Law 144 | July 5, 2023 | In Effect | $500 first violation; $500–$1,500 per subsequent violation per day | $399 | View Package |
| New York City | NYC Bias Audit Management Kit | July 5, 2023 | In Effect | $500 first violation; $500–$1,500 per subsequent violation per day | $129 | View Package |
| New York City | NYC Candidate Notice Kit | July 5, 2023 | In Effect | $500 first violation; $500–$1,500 per subsequent violation per day | $89 | View Package |
| Texas | Texas TDPSA | July 1, 2024 | In Effect | Up to $7,500 per violation (§ 541.155) | $249 | View Package |
| Oregon | Oregon CPA | July 1, 2024 | In Effect | Up to $7,500 per violation (UTPA, ORS § 646A.589) | $249 | View Package |
| Montana | Montana MCDPA | October 1, 2024 | In Effect | Up to $7,500 per violation (§ 30-14-2820) | $249 | View Package |
| Delaware | Delaware PDPA | January 1, 2025 | In Effect | Up to $10,000 per violation (§ 12D-111) | $249 | View Package |
| New Jersey | New Jersey NJDPA | January 15, 2025 | In Effect | Civil penalty per violation (NJDPA) | $249 | View Package |
| Minnesota | Minnesota MCDPA | July 31, 2025 | In Effect | Up to $7,500 per violation (§325M.20(c)) | $349 | View Package |
| Illinois | Illinois HB3773 | January 1, 2026 | In Effect | Up to $70,000 per violation (repeat); $16,000 first offense | $299 | View Package |
| California | California CCPA ADMT | January 1, 2026 | In Effect | $2,500 per violation; $7,500 per intentional violation | $499 | View Package |
| Indiana | Indiana ICDPA | January 1, 2026 | Effective Soon | Up to $7,500 per violation (IC 24-15-10-2) | $249 | View Package |
| Kentucky | Kentucky KCDPA | January 1, 2026 | Effective Soon | Civil penalty per violation (KRS Chapter 367) | $249 | View Package |
| Illinois | IL Notice & Response Kit | January 1, 2026 | In Effect | Up to $70,000 per violation (repeat offenders); $16,000 first offense | $79 | View Package |
| Illinois | IL Zip Code Proxy Audit | January 1, 2026 | In Effect | Up to $70,000 per violation (repeat offenders); $16,000 first offense | $99 | View Package |
| California | CA ADMT Notice & Opt-Out Kit | January 1, 2026 | In Effect | $2,500 per unintentional violation; $7,500 per intentional violation | $99 | View Package |
| California | CA ADMT Access Kit | January 1, 2026 | In Effect | $2,500 per unintentional violation; $7,500 per intentional violation | $89 | View Package |
| California | CA Cyber Audit Kit | January 1, 2026 | In Effect | $2,500 per unintentional violation; $7,500 per intentional violation | $149 | View Package |
| Colorado | Colorado SB 24-205 | June 30, 2026 | Effective Soon | Up to $20,000 per violation ($50,000 for age 60+) | $449 | View Package |
| Colorado | CO Appeal & Correction Kit | June 30, 2026 | Effective Soon | Up to $20,000 per violation ($50,000 for age 60+) | $99 | View Package |
| Colorado | CO AG Reporting Kit | June 30, 2026 | Effective Soon | Up to $20,000 per violation ($50,000 for age 60+) | $129 | View Package |
| Colorado | CO Dev-Deploy Exchange Kit | June 30, 2026 | Effective Soon | Up to $20,000 per violation ($50,000 for age 60+) | $109 | View Package |
Virginia
Virginia CDPA
- Effective
- January 1, 2023
- Max Penalty
- Up to $7,500 per violation (§ 59.1-584(C))
Virginia
VA Consumer Rights Kit
- Effective
- January 1, 2023
- Max Penalty
- Up to $7,500 per violation (§ 59.1-584(C))
Virginia
VA Profiling Assessment Workbook
- Effective
- January 1, 2023
- Max Penalty
- Up to $7,500 per violation (§ 59.1-584(C))
Virginia
VA Controller-Processor Kit
- Effective
- January 1, 2023
- Max Penalty
- Up to $7,500 per violation (§ 59.1-584(C))
Connecticut
Connecticut CTDPA
- Effective
- July 1, 2023
- Max Penalty
- Up to $5,000 per violation (CUTPA, § 42-110o)
New York City
NYC Local Law 144
- Effective
- July 5, 2023
- Max Penalty
- $500 first violation; $500–$1,500 per subsequent violation per day
New York City
NYC Bias Audit Management Kit
- Effective
- July 5, 2023
- Max Penalty
- $500 first violation; $500–$1,500 per subsequent violation per day
New York City
NYC Candidate Notice Kit
- Effective
- July 5, 2023
- Max Penalty
- $500 first violation; $500–$1,500 per subsequent violation per day
Texas
Texas TDPSA
- Effective
- July 1, 2024
- Max Penalty
- Up to $7,500 per violation (§ 541.155)
Oregon
Oregon CPA
- Effective
- July 1, 2024
- Max Penalty
- Up to $7,500 per violation (UTPA, ORS § 646A.589)
Montana
Montana MCDPA
- Effective
- October 1, 2024
- Max Penalty
- Up to $7,500 per violation (§ 30-14-2820)
Delaware
Delaware PDPA
- Effective
- January 1, 2025
- Max Penalty
- Up to $10,000 per violation (§ 12D-111)
New Jersey
New Jersey NJDPA
- Effective
- January 15, 2025
- Max Penalty
- Civil penalty per violation (NJDPA)
Minnesota
Minnesota MCDPA
- Effective
- July 31, 2025
- Max Penalty
- Up to $7,500 per violation (§325M.20(c))
Illinois
Illinois HB3773
- Effective
- January 1, 2026
- Max Penalty
- Up to $70,000 per violation (repeat); $16,000 first offense
California
California CCPA ADMT
- Effective
- January 1, 2026
- Max Penalty
- $2,500 per violation; $7,500 per intentional violation
Indiana
Indiana ICDPA
- Effective
- January 1, 2026
- Max Penalty
- Up to $7,500 per violation (IC 24-15-10-2)
Kentucky
Kentucky KCDPA
- Effective
- January 1, 2026
- Max Penalty
- Civil penalty per violation (KRS Chapter 367)
Illinois
IL Notice & Response Kit
- Effective
- January 1, 2026
- Max Penalty
- Up to $70,000 per violation (repeat offenders); $16,000 first offense
Illinois
IL Zip Code Proxy Audit
- Effective
- January 1, 2026
- Max Penalty
- Up to $70,000 per violation (repeat offenders); $16,000 first offense
California
CA ADMT Notice & Opt-Out Kit
- Effective
- January 1, 2026
- Max Penalty
- $2,500 per unintentional violation; $7,500 per intentional violation
California
CA ADMT Access Kit
- Effective
- January 1, 2026
- Max Penalty
- $2,500 per unintentional violation; $7,500 per intentional violation
California
CA Cyber Audit Kit
- Effective
- January 1, 2026
- Max Penalty
- $2,500 per unintentional violation; $7,500 per intentional violation
Colorado
Colorado SB 24-205
- Effective
- June 30, 2026
- Max Penalty
- Up to $20,000 per violation ($50,000 for age 60+)
Colorado
CO Appeal & Correction Kit
- Effective
- June 30, 2026
- Max Penalty
- Up to $20,000 per violation ($50,000 for age 60+)
Colorado
CO AG Reporting Kit
- Effective
- June 30, 2026
- Max Penalty
- Up to $20,000 per violation ($50,000 for age 60+)
Colorado
CO Dev-Deploy Exchange Kit
- Effective
- June 30, 2026
- Max Penalty
- Up to $20,000 per violation ($50,000 for age 60+)
What These Laws Have in Common
Despite being written independently across more than a dozen state legislatures, most of these laws follow a recognizable pattern. At the core, almost every state AI law requires some form of notice to people affected by AI-driven decisions. If your system is making or significantly influencing decisions about someone — who gets hired, who gets a loan, who pays more for insurance — that person is typically entitled to know that AI is involved.
Most laws also require documented assessments of AI risk and potential for discrimination. These go by different names — data protection assessments, impact assessments, algorithmic impact assessments — but the core question is the same: have you evaluated whether this AI system treats different demographic groups differently, and have you documented that evaluation? Virginia, Connecticut, Oregon, Texas, Delaware, Minnesota, Indiana, Montana, Kentucky, and New Jersey all require this for profiling activities. Colorado requires it for consequential decisions more broadly.
Enforcement across all these laws runs almost exclusively through state Attorneys General. None of the current state AI or privacy laws create a private right of action specifically for AI violations — meaning a consumer can't sue you directly for an ADMT violation the way they could for a contract breach. But AG offices in states like California, Colorado, and Minnesota have explicitly flagged AI enforcement as a priority heading into 2026, and AG offices don't need a consumer complaint to open an investigation.
Perhaps the most important pattern is how penalties multiply with automated systems. Most of these laws set penalties on a per-violation basis — and when an AI system makes thousands of decisions per day, "per violation" can mean something very different than it does with a human-driven process. A $7,500 per-violation penalty is manageable when you make ten manual decisions a month. It's a different calculation when your hiring platform screens 500 resumes a day.
Not Sure Which Applies to You?
Your obligations depend on where you operate, who you serve, and how you use AI. Here's a quick guide by situation.
Employers using AI in hiring
If you use any automated tool to screen, rank, or score candidates, three states have specific employer AI laws.
Or get the multi-state employer bundleBusinesses collecting consumer data
If you use personal data for profiling, targeting, or automated decisions, most state privacy laws require documented assessments.
Or get the multi-state profiling bundleOperating in many states
If you serve customers in multiple states, the Multi-State Profiling Assessment Bundle covers 15+ state assessment requirements in a single framework — so you're not building separate documents for each jurisdiction.
Multi-State Profiling BundleBrowse All 53 Compliance Packages
State laws, federal frameworks, multi-state bundles, and industry-specific packages. Each built against the actual enacted statute text.
View All Packages