Skip to main content
Updated March 2026

AI Compliance Requirements by State

27 states have enacted AI or data privacy laws that require specific documentation from businesses using AI. Here's how they compare.

State AI Law Comparison

Sorted by effective date, earliest first. Only state-level laws with active documentation requirements shown.

Virginia

Virginia CDPA

In Effect
Effective
January 1, 2023
Max Penalty
Up to $7,500 per violation (§ 59.1-584(C))

Virginia

VA Consumer Rights Kit

In Effect
Effective
January 1, 2023
Max Penalty
Up to $7,500 per violation (§ 59.1-584(C))

Virginia

VA Profiling Assessment Workbook

In Effect
Effective
January 1, 2023
Max Penalty
Up to $7,500 per violation (§ 59.1-584(C))

Virginia

VA Controller-Processor Kit

In Effect
Effective
January 1, 2023
Max Penalty
Up to $7,500 per violation (§ 59.1-584(C))

Connecticut

Connecticut CTDPA

In Effect
Effective
July 1, 2023
Max Penalty
Up to $5,000 per violation (CUTPA, § 42-110o)

New York City

NYC Local Law 144

In Effect
Effective
July 5, 2023
Max Penalty
$500 first violation; $500–$1,500 per subsequent violation per day

New York City

NYC Bias Audit Management Kit

In Effect
Effective
July 5, 2023
Max Penalty
$500 first violation; $500–$1,500 per subsequent violation per day

New York City

NYC Candidate Notice Kit

In Effect
Effective
July 5, 2023
Max Penalty
$500 first violation; $500–$1,500 per subsequent violation per day

Texas

Texas TDPSA

In Effect
Effective
July 1, 2024
Max Penalty
Up to $7,500 per violation (§ 541.155)

Oregon

Oregon CPA

In Effect
Effective
July 1, 2024
Max Penalty
Up to $7,500 per violation (UTPA, ORS § 646A.589)

Montana

Montana MCDPA

In Effect
Effective
October 1, 2024
Max Penalty
Up to $7,500 per violation (§ 30-14-2820)

Delaware

Delaware PDPA

In Effect
Effective
January 1, 2025
Max Penalty
Up to $10,000 per violation (§ 12D-111)

New Jersey

New Jersey NJDPA

In Effect
Effective
January 15, 2025
Max Penalty
Civil penalty per violation (NJDPA)

Minnesota

Minnesota MCDPA

In Effect
Effective
July 31, 2025
Max Penalty
Up to $7,500 per violation (§325M.20(c))

Illinois

Illinois HB3773

In Effect
Effective
January 1, 2026
Max Penalty
Up to $70,000 per violation (repeat); $16,000 first offense

California

California CCPA ADMT

In Effect
Effective
January 1, 2026
Max Penalty
$2,500 per violation; $7,500 per intentional violation

Indiana

Indiana ICDPA

Effective Soon
Effective
January 1, 2026
Max Penalty
Up to $7,500 per violation (IC 24-15-10-2)

Kentucky

Kentucky KCDPA

Effective Soon
Effective
January 1, 2026
Max Penalty
Civil penalty per violation (KRS Chapter 367)

Illinois

IL Notice & Response Kit

In Effect
Effective
January 1, 2026
Max Penalty
Up to $70,000 per violation (repeat offenders); $16,000 first offense

Illinois

IL Zip Code Proxy Audit

In Effect
Effective
January 1, 2026
Max Penalty
Up to $70,000 per violation (repeat offenders); $16,000 first offense

California

CA ADMT Notice & Opt-Out Kit

In Effect
Effective
January 1, 2026
Max Penalty
$2,500 per unintentional violation; $7,500 per intentional violation

California

CA ADMT Access Kit

In Effect
Effective
January 1, 2026
Max Penalty
$2,500 per unintentional violation; $7,500 per intentional violation

California

CA Cyber Audit Kit

In Effect
Effective
January 1, 2026
Max Penalty
$2,500 per unintentional violation; $7,500 per intentional violation

Colorado

Colorado SB 24-205

Effective Soon
Effective
June 30, 2026
Max Penalty
Up to $20,000 per violation ($50,000 for age 60+)

Colorado

CO Appeal & Correction Kit

Effective Soon
Effective
June 30, 2026
Max Penalty
Up to $20,000 per violation ($50,000 for age 60+)

Colorado

CO AG Reporting Kit

Effective Soon
Effective
June 30, 2026
Max Penalty
Up to $20,000 per violation ($50,000 for age 60+)

Colorado

CO Dev-Deploy Exchange Kit

Effective Soon
Effective
June 30, 2026
Max Penalty
Up to $20,000 per violation ($50,000 for age 60+)

What These Laws Have in Common

Despite being written independently across more than a dozen state legislatures, most of these laws follow a recognizable pattern. At the core, almost every state AI law requires some form of notice to people affected by AI-driven decisions. If your system is making or significantly influencing decisions about someone — who gets hired, who gets a loan, who pays more for insurance — that person is typically entitled to know that AI is involved.

Most laws also require documented assessments of AI risk and potential for discrimination. These go by different names — data protection assessments, impact assessments, algorithmic impact assessments — but the core question is the same: have you evaluated whether this AI system treats different demographic groups differently, and have you documented that evaluation? Virginia, Connecticut, Oregon, Texas, Delaware, Minnesota, Indiana, Montana, Kentucky, and New Jersey all require this for profiling activities. Colorado requires it for consequential decisions more broadly.

Enforcement across all these laws runs almost exclusively through state Attorneys General. None of the current state AI or privacy laws create a private right of action specifically for AI violations — meaning a consumer can't sue you directly for an ADMT violation the way they could for a contract breach. But AG offices in states like California, Colorado, and Minnesota have explicitly flagged AI enforcement as a priority heading into 2026, and AG offices don't need a consumer complaint to open an investigation.

Perhaps the most important pattern is how penalties multiply with automated systems. Most of these laws set penalties on a per-violation basis — and when an AI system makes thousands of decisions per day, "per violation" can mean something very different than it does with a human-driven process. A $7,500 per-violation penalty is manageable when you make ten manual decisions a month. It's a different calculation when your hiring platform screens 500 resumes a day.

Not Sure Which Applies to You?

Your obligations depend on where you operate, who you serve, and how you use AI. Here's a quick guide by situation.

Employers using AI in hiring

If you use any automated tool to screen, rank, or score candidates, three states have specific employer AI laws.

Or get the multi-state employer bundle

Businesses collecting consumer data

If you use personal data for profiling, targeting, or automated decisions, most state privacy laws require documented assessments.

Or get the multi-state profiling bundle

Operating in many states

If you serve customers in multiple states, the Multi-State Profiling Assessment Bundle covers 15+ state assessment requirements in a single framework — so you're not building separate documents for each jurisdiction.

Multi-State Profiling Bundle

Browse All 53 Compliance Packages

State laws, federal frameworks, multi-state bundles, and industry-specific packages. Each built against the actual enacted statute text.

View All Packages